My Holiday Traditions, Part 1

Thoughts & reflections regarding my personal holiday traditions have been rattling around my head for the last several weeks, so I decided to put it into writing. What follows is probably the most self-indulgent, least amusing bit of blogging/posting you will ever see out of me. And it comes in three parts, for triple the fun!

If the people that knew me best were to compile a list of adjectives to describe me, “sentimental” would rank pretty far down. Probably into the triple digits. Which is why it surprises people that I am a sucker for the time of year called “The Holidays.”

I think it may have its roots in my love of ritual, and my history buff’s appreciation for the power of tradition. I am an amateur folklorist, and a basically an overgrown (alcoholic) kid. All of these things combine to form a set of traditions I go through from October to December with the dogged tenacity of a worker ant with OCD. Some are universal, some are deeply personal. And the scary thing is, more seem to get added from year to year, and very few fall away. Maybe soon I’ll experience that holiday “stress” people are always whining about. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Life & Other Distractions

My Top 15 Movies Of All Time

[2022 Ed. Note — Oh my, how this list has changed in the last decade-and-a-half…Consider this an historical artifact.]

Here, in no particular order, is a list of films I either really enjoyed or had a profound impact on me as a film-goer, but didn’t quite make my Top 15 list:

Ghostbusters, Glengarry Glen Ross, Alien, Remains Of The Day, The Wild Bunch, Nixon, The Departed, Unforgiven, The Shining, Monty Python’s Life of Brian, The Big Lebowski, The Good The Bad & The Ugly, Grosse Point Blank, Reservoir Dogs, The Godfather Part 2, Full Metal Jacket, Butch Cassidy & The Sundance Kid, Bridge On The River Kwai, Brazil, O Brother Where Art Thou?, Casablanca, Gangs of New York, When Harry Met Sally, Mary Poppins, Amadeus, Back To The Future, Star Wars Trilogy (Original), The Lord of the Rings Trilogy, The Hunt For Red October, Jackie Brown, Boogie Nights, Batman Begins, Ronin, Swingers, Wag The Dog, Traffic, Paths Of Glory, Schindler’s List, Braveheart, The Searchers, Copland, Fargo, A Fish Called Wanda, Richard III, Raging Bull, Chinatown, The Last Temptation Of Christ, Apollo 13, Clerks, The Lion In Winter, Planes Trains & Automobiles, Midnight Run, Dazed & Confused

Here is a quick rundown of my #6-15:

15. RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK
Speaks for itself
14. DUCK SOUP
Modern cinematic comedy begins here. None of the gloopy sentimentality of Chaplin, or the mechanical blankness of Keaton. The Marx Brothers were anarchic, surreal, and superhuman. This flick has bonus dose of anti-war satire (most pointedly in the gala musical number “All God’s Chillun Got Guns.”)
13. ALMOST FAMOUS
Anyone who’s ever had their lives enriched by a headlong, reckless plunge into loving music at an early age will recognize themselves in this movie.
12. HEAT
Cops and crooks are equally unhappy with the lives they’ve carved out for themselves. Obsession is unhealthy, folks, no matter what side of the law you’re on. This also boasts one of the best shoot-outs captured on film
11. RIO BRAVO
A reminder that you should always be able to rely on the redemptive power of friendship
10. FARGO
In looking over the Coen Brothers filmography, this is the best of a damn good bunch
9. ED WOOD
A beautiful black-and-white valentine to everyone who has more enthusiasm than talent
8. A HARD DAY’S NIGHT
A white-hot jolt of sheer joy and energy. Director Richard Lester invents the jittery visual vocabulary of the music video, and the Beatles are the fuckin’ Beatles.
7. MASH
Anyone who’s ever been stuck in a crummy place where you can’t really leave, and the people in charge can’t really get rid of you, has tendency to act out in inappropriate ways. Robert Altman’s signature style (episodic plot, overlapping semi-improvised dialogue) has lost some of its uniqueness, but none of it’s anti-authority bite. And on a personal note, the 4077th bears a few superficial similarities to the school I work at. (The leadership style of our principal owes more to Col. Henry Blake than Ed Rooney.) By the way, I’ve always hated the TV show. Hawkeye is Donald Goddam Sutherland, not that smirking bitch Alan Alda.
6. THE GODFATHER Sooo close to the #5 spot, but without it’s tragic, inevitable denouement in Part 2, the story feels unfinished.

And now, the TOP 5:

#5. DR STRANGELOVE OR, HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND LOVE THE BOMB
Filmed by Stanley Kubrick in a straight-faced gritty documentary style, this classic dark comedy tackles the darkest subject of all: global nuclear annihilation. Rogue Air Force General Jack D. Ripper, driven insane by sexual impotence, orders his B-52s to drop their nukes on the Soviets, which would trigger the Soviet’s top-secret “Doomsday Device,” with worldwide destruction to follow. Tone and character are everything in this movie. Lines like “He’ll see everything! He’ll see the big board!” read like nothing on paper, but become perfect comic gems when spouted in context by the likes of Peter Sellers and George C. Scott.

Peter Sellers is nearly forgotten these days, and those who do remember him remember him mainly for the endless series of Pink Panther sequels made by Blake Edwards in the 1970s. Sellers was depressed and frail, dying slowly from heart disease, when he was put through his Inspector Clouseau paces by the overrated hack Edwards in an increasingly desperate series of slapstick-y schtick. The first two Clouseau movies, made a decade earlier, were a delight…which leads me to the Sellers of the swinging 60’s. A comic whirlwind, tossing off surreal radio shows, comedy albums chock full of characters and accents, and his specialty — playing multiple roles in a single film.

He plays three characters in Dr. Strangelove: a very proper British RAF officer, the exasperated President of the United States (based on 50’s politician Adlai Stevenson), and the titular Doctor, an ex-Nazi scientist employed by the U.S. government (but unable to control his prosthetic arm, which continues to throw up the Nazi salute.) The President’s one-sided phone conversation with the Soviet premier is a scene for the ages: “Dimitri, one of our base commanders went a little funny in the head…and went and did a silly thing…”

In any other movie, this tour de force performance would be the highlight (I guarantee you, people unfamiliar with Sellers will not be able to tell it’s him in the different roles), but it must take second place to George C. Scott as Air Force General Buck Turgidson. A perfect portrait of the ultra right-wing military fanatic, Scott’s Turgidson is an eye-rolling, gum-chomping force of nature. He cheerfully believes the U.S. will come out on top in any nuclear exchange: “Now, I’m not saying we wouldn’t get our hair mussed, but I do say no more than ten to twenty million killed, tops. Depending on the breaks.”

Sellers, Scott, and veteran western actor Slim Pickens as B-52 pilot Maj. “King” Kong (who takes the famous hat-waving ride on the descending nuclear bomb) play caricatures, yes, but just realistic enough to remind you that sometimes the people in charge, in real life, are complete idiots.

#4. PULP FICTION
Ah, 1994. A hell of a year. I was 19, occupying a two-bedroom apartment with 4 other junior college students, with a shock of dark hair falling across my forehead like an anime character, and weighing 130 pounds soaking wet. I hung around coffee shops, took creative writing classes. Demon alcohol had not yet passed my lips. It was also the year my eyes were fully opened to the possibilities of cinema.

Despite what a lot of people think, Pulp Fiction did not arrive like a bolt from the blue. I saw Reservoir Dogs on video that spring, and became an instant Tarantino fan. I soon began hearing rumblings on E! reports from Cannes about the new Tarantino film taking the festival by storm. An issue of Entertainment Weekly that summer featured the four principal cast members in costume (but Sam Jackson, strangely, without his jheri-curl wig). Something was brewing, and I wanted in on it. Fevered to the frothing point, I bought my ticket for the 10:15 show on opening night. October 5, 1994. I still have the ticket. It was playing in one of the smaller auditoriums in the cineplex. It was half-full. Six people walked out before it was over. I was blown away. Walking weak-kneed from the theater at one in the morning, I wanted to to do it all over again. I corralled one of my roommates to see it the next night. We left feeling so…fucking…cool. We bought a pack of cigarettes afterwards, and drove around town with the windows down, smoking and being cool.

I had considered myself an avid movie-goer prior to this, but really, to me, movies were divided into two basic categories: Summer Blockbusters (Batman, T2), and Middlebrow Oscar Bait (Rain Man, Dances With Wolves). I enjoyed both equally, but Pulp Fiction showed me there could be more. Tarantino wears his influences on his sleeve (to a fault, sometimes), so following his trail of breadcrumbs sent me down the road to French New Wave, Kurosawa, spaghetti westerns, and indies, indies, indies. If it had the Miramax logo on it, I rented it. Which, a few years later, led to the sad discovery that indie movies could be just as inane and pointless as the mainstream fare they were meant to be “better” than (as anyone who has sat through Basquiat and Search And Destroy can attest.)

Anyway, by Christmas our apartment soon sported a huge Pulp Fiction poster in the dining area, my roommates and I swapped P.F. dialogue, and…P.F.’s true lasting legacy to me…I began watching more and more varied movies, began to truly understand the vocabulary of film, and began to be a critical viewer.

#3 GOODFELLAS
Martin Scorsese is my all-time favorite director. An unoriginal choice, but true. (If you want originality in choices of favorite movie directors, buy me a drink and ask me about Walter Hill.) Scorsese always manages to keep the audience slightly off-kilter, his eye always prowling, without the amped-up hyperness of those who try to imitate his style. The stories he chooses to film are perpetual motion machines, feeding their own flames, inhabited by unpredictable and obsessive characters. I have never looked at my watch during a Scorsese film, which is the highest praise I can give a director. (All right, I sneaked a few peeks during Kundun.)

In Goodfellas, Scorsese strips away the romantic sheen that Coppola’s Godfather films layered over the Mafia lifestyle. The wiseguys in Scorsese’s world drove Cadillacs and wore flashy suits, but had to hustle non-stop to keep up appearances. In one of the character’s own words, they were “blue-collar guys” who could not enjoy the ill-gotten fruits of their labor because they were always looking over their shoulder, worrying about “rats,” or looking ahead to the next score. The violence in Goodfellas was not “movie violence.” It looks like it hurts. When Henry Hill pistol-whips his girlfriend’s neighbor, every bone-shattering blow is punctuated with a sickly “thuck” sound, and the brutal stomping of Billy Batts dispels forever the idea of “honor” among thieves. These are ugly people…and the audience is complicit in their ugliness. Scorsese’s characters are more often than not weighed down with guilt complexes, but there is no guilt among the wiseguys in Goodfellas. The guilty ones are the viewers for being so willingly drawn into the web Scorsese spins. Even the most sympathetic character, Karen Hill, shamefully admits to being “turned on” by Henry’s violent proclivities. She speaks for all of us, whether we admit it or not.

The story ends in a haze of cocaine and paranoia, with the solo Mick Jagger song “Memo From Turner” blaring on the soundtrack. (No one can pick musical cues better than Scorsese, except, maybe…Tarantino.) Scorsese and long-time editor Thelma Schoonmaker build this sequence up to a crescendo, squeezing every last morsel of tension out a man at his wit’s end and coming apart at the seams. As progressive as the filmmaking techniques are, Scorsese is forever looking backwards in terms of storytelling. The day-to-day life of a hoodlum is chronicled with all the matter-of-factness of a black & white TV crime drama of the early 1960s, and Ray Liotta’s rat-a-tat voiceover owes a lot to the 30s-40s pulp tradition of Dashiell Hammett and the film noir he inspired.

#2. APOCALYPSE NOW
This movie has it all: great action, memorable (and highly quotable) dialogue, philosophical undertones, and it’s an epic mind-fuck to boot.

Based on Joseph Conrad’s dense, difficult novel Heart Of Darkness (with 1960s Vietnam replacing turn-of-the-century Africa), it’s the fundamentally simple story of a military intelligence operative (Capt. Willard) sent on a covert mission with a small boat crew up the Nung River through Vietnam and into off-limits Cambodia to “terminate” the command of a rogue officer (Col. Kurtz) who has set himself up as a god among the primitive Degar tribe.

The plot merely serves as a sturdy clothesline for director Francis Ford Coppola’s series of increasingly surreal and disturbing set-pieces that pop off like a string of firecrackers in the viewer’s mind every ten minutes or so. Willard’s pre-mission drunken, sobbing breakdown in his hotel room…the air cavalry attack on the Viet Cong village set to the strains of “Ride of the Valkyries”…the mango hunt in the hazy jungle (photographed in cool, blue light) that results in a face-to-face encounter with a ferocious beast…the USO show where sex-starved soldiers rush the stage to get at a trio of unfortunate Playboy bunnies…the LSD-addled rendezvous with other isolated U.S. personnel at Do Long bridge. “Who’s in charge here, soldier?” asks Willard of one of the bridge’s weary defenders. “Ain’t you?” comes the befuddled reply. The film’s implication is that any attempt to control or corral killing and brutality when it is manifest on such an enormous scale is ultimately laughable. No one is really in charge when insanity reaches this level.

Willard (played by Martin Sheen with characteristic intensity) finally reaches the Colonel’s compound hidden deep in the jungle. He encounters a long-missing photojournalist (Dennis Hopper) who is clearly bugshit crazy, acting as a sort of jabbering spokesman for the as-yet-unseen Kurtz. When Kurtz (Marlon Brando) finally deigns to appear, you never quite see all of him at once. He is clearly an immense mountain of a human being, but he lurks in the shadows, sweating, wheezing, philosophizing. He may be just as crazy as the photojournalist, but when he speaks, he makes a lot more sense.

KURTZ: Are you an assassin?
WILLARD: I’m a soldier.
KURTZ: You’re neither. You’re an errand boy, sent by grocers to collect a bill.

Kurtz is no more of a monster than anyone in position of great authority. He just happened to have the opportunity and knowledge to harness his darker impulses so effectively that other people “in charge” (see above) see their pettiness and ineptitude thrown into stark relief by Kurtz’s sheer power of will. And it terrifies them. And in the end, they send Willard to sacrifice Kurtz in order to atone for the sins of everyone who ever stepped on innocents during the course of an ideological crusade, everyone who believes the end always justifies the means. Balance is restored. The horror…the horror.

I feel like I have gone on quite a bit, and yet barely scratched the surface. The performances, the music, the ideas are all top-hole, especially the mind-blowing visuals, done full-scale and for real, which makes today’s CGI-fests look like an ADD kid’s paint-by-numbers set.

CHECK IT OUT: Hearts Of Darkness: A Filmmaker’s Apocalypse – recently out on DVD, this documentary shows that the process to create this film was just as insane and exhausting as the film itself.
AVOID IT: Apocalypse Now Redux – The extended “director’s cut” edition of the film. Every added scene detracts mightily from the impact of the original. The Coppola that made these choices is the Coppola that made Jack, not the Coppola that made The Godfather or the original Apocalypse.

#1. JAWS
Steven Spielberg’s film takes storytelling down to it’s most primal core: man vs. wild. These are the stories spun by Cro Magnons around the campfire. Jaws touches the fear that lives at our deepest core, lurking in our psyches since we lay in our bassinets: getting devoured alive by a hulking beast. To add to that fear, it happens in an element where we humans are most out of our element. To quote my friend Erik Hanson, “The ocean is as much the bad guy [as the shark].” Too true. Our bodies were not meant for water. On the few occasions when I have swum out past my depth in a body of natural water, the merest brush of seaweed on my foot causes me to yip like a scalded Chihuahua and splash comically toward the shore.

So here we have the story of water-hating, boat-hating uptight Martin Brody (Roy Schieder), who happens to be the police chief of an island community that exists on the bounty the beaches provide (i.e., tourism.) When a killer shark shatters the idyll by attacking swimmers, Brody must face his fears and do something about it.

Often derided by cinephiles for kicking the door open for the “summer blockbuster”-type movie, Jaws never sacrifices story for spectacle, or loses sight of the human element. Time is spent observing Brody’s relationship with his wife and sons, giving the hard life-or-death choices he makes at the end of the film an extra, chilling perspective. Even the human characters we are anxious to boo and hiss, like the “greedy” mayor who wants to keep the beaches open, can reveal themselves as real people and engage our sympathies. In his final scene with Brody, the mayor chokes back tears and whispers “My kids were on that beach, too.” He had miscalculated the scope of the problem, and genuinely wanted what was best for his town. The villain stereotype falls away, and we are left once again with the film’s real enemy: The sea, and the sea’s frightening superiority over each and every one of us.

Brody reluctantly takes to the high seas, aided by shark-hunter Quint (Robert Shaw) and ichthyologist Hooper (Richard Dreyfuss) for the final third of the film, and we see how isolated they are. Nothing but sea and sky, and their ramshackle little fishing vessel that begins falling apart, bit by bit…Spielberg wisely chose to shoot these sequences on the real ocean, rather than the studio tanks that were in common usage back then. No doubt it added to the budget, and the cast and crew’s discomfort, but the visceral reality of the sea chase scenes make it worth it. Quint’s monologue (written specially for the film by John Milius, and expanded on by actor/playwright Shaw before cameras rolled) about the fate of the USS Indianapolis illustrates the battle they are fighting is only the latest installment in an age-old conflict.

John Williams’s creepy score has become synonymous with being stalked by unknown horror, and this movie made the career of relative unknown Steven Spielberg. It’s numerous inferior sequels and the “blockbuster” mentality it inspired in studios should not be blamed on this amazing, edge-of-your seat adventure film, that still packs a few jolts for those who haven’t seen it (yes, they exist.)

Leave a comment

Filed under Film & TV

Thoughts On The Dark Knight

Despite many other tendencies that qualify me as a complete social outcast, I do not burn with the love of comic books, nor the cinematic abortions they often spawn. But in this business of show that we love so much, any source material is fair game, and many fine motion pictures have been made on the flimsiest of premises. Even freakin’ songs, although that might not be the best example. (Something To Talk About, anyone? I didn’t think so.)

Before I’m buried in a nerd-alanche of fanboy rage, let me state clearly I have nothing against comics, per se. Any time I come off that way, it’s usually to indulge in one of my favorite pastimes, namely, busting  my friend MDG’s balls about his disturbing attempts to cling to his long-vanished privileged childhood.

I doubt there’s a large number of folks who developed a passion for comics in adulthood. It seems to be a seed that’s planted in the formative years, and as the comic-reader matures, he (or she…nah, who am I kidding, HE) can indulge himself in a wide variety of material designed with the adult reader in mind. Having read Scott McCloud’s excellent Understanding Comics some years ago, it’s pretty clear that the text + art storytelling style either clicks with a reader, or doesn’t, and as any proselytizing comic fan knows, it’s a difficult task to convert the unbeliever. Usually they will tell you they liked something about the pile of books you loaned them, just to get you to shut up and leave them alone.

Apart from the occasional copy of “Batman” or “G.I. Joe” purchased at the grocery store, or tucked as an afterthought into a Christmas stocking, I led a comic-free childhood, which is NOT to say I led a Batman-free childhood. I loved Batman from pre-school onward, and I honestly have no idea where I picked it up. Those Batman comics I acquired were a result of my Batman love, not the cause. The 1960s “campy” TV show was not showing in reruns at that time on any channel I watched. I guess my interest was sparked by a combination of Superfriends on Saturday mornings, and the fact Batman drove a bitchin’ car, and my pre-school friend Stuart. Stuart and I would gallivant around the playground playing “Batman & Robin” constantly. I was quite content to be Robin. Stuart was an excitable, short, pudgy fellow, and it must have been quite a sight to see a Boy Wonder towering a full head over a lisping, waddling Dark Knight, prattling about his “thuperpowerth.” (I even knew at the time Batman had no real “thuperpowerth,” but Stuart was the only playmate I hadn’t yet alienated with my ill-tempered nastiness, so I was not about to call him out on canonical technicalities.)

Batman is, of course, the favorite comic book hero of people who don’t read comics. A good, dramatic back story, the cool “dark outsider” persona, and the aforementioned bitchin’ car, all contribute to Batman’s iconic status across the popular culture landscape. For these reasons, I have heard some complain that the average movie-goer’s appreciation of Batman is “shallow.” Nothing could be further from the truth. The Fantastic Four did not really affect the average movie-goer because everyone could give less than a shit about Reed Richards. Batman moves people.

So yes, I am still a Batman fan. Yes, I liked the 1966 Batman movie (I was about nine when I taped it off TV, and wore out the tape). My sole “graphic novel” purchase with my own money was The Dark Knight Returns at age 13. I liked the Tim Burton films. I definitely liked Batman Begins (with a few reservations, see below). So I was predisposed to like The Dark Knight.

And, like most folks, I was not disappointed. The film carried itself with the air of a serious crime-drama, more like Heat or The Departed (in keeping with Batman’s origins in Detective Comics.) It dramatically utilized real Chicago locations, and made the most of small settings and character moments, like Dent’s desk and bookcase planted in what appeared to be a busy hallway (parking him at the heart of the action in the DA’s office), or Wayne’s disgusted tossing of his champagne when no one was looking (keep the temple clean, Bruce). All the real carnage happens just off-camera (ensuring the PG-13 rating), but edited in a Hitchcockian way to make the audience’s imagination fill in the grisly blanks.

The idea of someone donning a costume and running around (like me and Stuart) fighting crime is so patently ridiculous that Batman Begins was obsessed with credibility and a “take-this-seriously” tone, to the point where it over-explained and over-rationalized everything. It made for a much more interesting Batman/Bruce Wayne (about time!), but at the expense of the villains, who were ciphers. Liam Neeson spent the first part of the film as semi-sympathetic mentor to Bruce Wayne, and Cillian Murphy? Out of his league. His fifteen minutes of screen time was not enough for even a good actor to make anything out of the underwritten Scarecrow character. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Film & TV

In defense of the Western

“The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted.” –D.H. Lawrence, 1920s.

This is the west, sir. When legend becomes fact, print the legend.
–John Ford’s The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance
Paramount Pictures, 1962.

America has contributed two great art forms to world culture: jazz music and the western.
–attributed to Clint Eastwood, early 1990s.

Around the time Clint Eastwood was doing publicity for his 1992 western Unforgiven, his somewhat reductive quote about jazz music and westerns began making the rounds. Now, I despise pretty much all jazz music (a bunch of instruments playing different songs at the same time, with drums that sound like shoes in a dryer), but I love westerns with an unseemly passion, and I have to agree with Clint that they are a uniquely American form of cinematic expression. Our historical background provides bottomless fodder for an art form that, like rock and roll, has been declared “dead” many times through the decades, but keeps hanging on. And we are all the more blessed for it.

Between the end of the Civil War (1865) and the year when the U.S. Census Bureau declared the American frontier “closed” (1890), was a relatively brief period of time that cast a huge shadow over the American character. The raw, primitive America of Daniel Boone and James Fenimore Cooper smashed up against the modern, materialistic America of John Rockefeller and Upton Sinclair. The two halves of the American Dream began an ugly grappling match – freedom & rugged individuality vs. wealth & community – which continues to this day, but much further below the surface. In those 25 or so years at the end of the 1800s, the naked savageness of this fight was very much on display, and the negative extremes of both sides had free reign. “Rugged individuality” often expressed itself in brutality and lawlessness, and “wealth” often expressed itself in a level of exploitation and greed far surpassing even today’s levels. When these two titanic forces clashed (or even circled each other warily) in such a tiny sliver of time, a modern mythology was created almost overnight.

The “Old West” began mythologizing itself before it was even over. The cheap pulp fiction about the exploits of such figures such as Wild Bill Hickock, Wyatt Earp, and Jesse James flew off the shelves during a time when the men themselves were still at the height of their careers. So many of the stock characters and situations (white-hatted good guys, showdowns at high noon) we see in westerns — usually bad ones — have their roots in the dime store fiction that was eagerly devoured by readers of the previous century.

A good western does not merely present us with the mythology, but attempts to answer why we’re attracted to that mythology in the first place through the actions of its characters. A good western is not merely a historical costume drama, but is a reflection of the era in which it was made. (For instance, the westerns of the 1940s and 50s emphasized duty and sacrifice, the westerns of the 1960s and 70s tended to be cynical and anti-authority, the westerns of the 1990s and 2000s explored the nature of violence and fame.) A good western gives us a glimpse into a funhouse mirror, showing an exaggerated reflection of all of our best and worst qualities.

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Film & TV, History

Top 20 Albums of 2007

#20. Band Of Horses – Cease To Begin
A haunting album both literally (several songs mention ghosts) and figuratively (it boasts the best break-up song of the year, “No One’s Gonna Love You”), Cease To Begin benefits from Band of Horses recent line-up change that put South Carolina’s Ben Bridwell firmly in the driver’s seat and allowing him to temper the band’s swirling indie-rock with a little more Southern gothic twang.
Key Tracks: “Is There A Ghost” “No One’s Gonna Love You” “The General Specific”

#19. Shout Out Louds – Our Ill Wills
Lead singer Adam Olenius’ yelping vocals certainly sound very familiar, which leads most people to make a hasty comparison between S.O.L. and the Cure. Vocals aside, the Cure’s tired shtick can’t hold a candle to the percussive, driving sound of this album. The bright, pop-oriented production counterbalances the dark themes of the lyrics, creating the aural equivalent of drinking a black-and-tan.
Key Tracks: “Parents Livingroom” “You Are Dreaming” “Impossible”

#18. Jackpot – Moonbreath
Local favorites (Sacramento) make my list for the third album in a row. Sonically, Moonbreath genre-hops between deadpan, Bowie-esque swagger (“Chemical Reaction”), Belle & Sebastian style chamber pop (“Tongue Tied”), and the alt-country and blues pastiches that are their specialty. An entire disc’s worth of hidden “bonus” material, far from being throwaways that didn’t make the final cut, actually strengthen the album’s overall appeal, especially the acoustic lament “Womanly Slippers.”
Key Tracks: Noted above, along with the love-it-or-hate-it “Vital Signs” (I love it).

#17. Jason Isbell – Sirens Of The Ditch
A member of the Drive-By Truckers from 2001 to 2007, Isbell wrote some of the band’s strongest material of that era (check out “Outfits” or the title track from 2003’s Decoration Day). As a solo artist, Isbell tones down the Skynyrd-style raunch of his former band to craft a more intimate, singer-songwriter sound. Imagine if Paul Westerberg had been born in down in Dixie.
Key Tracks: “Down In A Hole” “Dress Blues” “The Devil Is My Running Mate”

#16 Kaiser Chiefs – Yours Truly, Angry Mob
The Chiefs avoid the sophomore slump by toning down the jangly pianos and dance-rock synths of their debut, and exchanging them for cranked-up guitars. They have kept the jittery, quadruple-espresso energy and pub singalong lyrics.
Key Tracks: “Ruby” “The Angry Mob” “Retirement”

#15 Black Rebel Motorcycle Club – “Baby 81”
A band that began as a better-than-average Jesus And Mary Chain knock-off came close to permanently imploding before roaring back to life with 2005’s semi-acoustic, gospel & blues-tinged Howl, recorded as a duo. The follow-up has the band back at full capacity, and combines the roots-rock song structures of Howl with the electric, hornet’s nest buzz of their first two albums.
Key Tracks: “Berlin” “Cold Wind” “666 Conducer”

#14 Wilco – “Sky Blue Sky”
A solid return to form after the aggressivley anti-melodic A Ghost Is Born. Jeff Tweedy has remembered to write actual songs here, and treats recently-joined guitarist Nels Cline like a new toy, spraying his jazzy licks all over the tracks like a drunk with a garden hose. The songs sport a mature, confident sound, reminiscent of “Rolling Thunder”-era Dylan.
Key Tracks: “Impossible Germany” “You Are My Face” “What Light”

#13 Vietnam – “Vietnam
Sounding like a tripped-out bar band through a haze of cough syrup, New York quartet Vietnam reel off their tales of losers and junkies to an audience they seem to believe is not really listening. Their loose, sometimes lazy, melodies are punched up with deft touches of brass and keyboard, but the guitars are the stars here.
Key Tracks: “Step On Inside” “Priest, Poet & The Pig” “Mr. Goldfinger”

#12 The Hives – “The Black And White Album”
As much as I like the Hives, I have to admit that their earlier albums tended to run out of gas before they were over. Not that they lacked energy (the Hives have no shortage of that), but the songs would begin to sound the same. Finally, with this album, they have crafted a batch of songs that are unique (and even experimental) from track to track without sacrificing their trademark sound.
Key Tracks: “Tick Tick Boom” “T.H.E.H.I.V.E.S.” “Well Allright”

#11 Against Me! – “New Wave”
Normally I enjoy politics in my music about as much as heavy cream in my screwdriver, but activist-minded Against Me! have managed to slip in their messages about the state of the world with enough subtlety so that it doesn’t weigh the album down into a pedantic lecture course. Long-time fans (I am not one) have cried “sell-out” due to this album’s toned-down agenda and hi-fi production…but people who cry “sell-out” tend to be no goddam fun. Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Music -- 2000s

Shame on you, Julie Taymor!

[This is my very first blog post. I wrote it over fifteen years ago.

It sucks.]

There is the casual Beatles fan, and then there’s me and Mark Lewisohn. (If you get that reference, you can join me and Mark Lewisohn.) About five people now have asked me if I’m going to see the new Beatles-oriented flick Across The Universe, and my answer is “No, and if you go see the Across The Universe and I find out you did, then you and I are no longer on speaking terms.” What director Julie Taymor has concocted is a paen to “casual” Beatles fans and obnoxious, aging Baby Boomers, and a slap in the face to “serious” Beatles fans everywhere.

OK, that last sentence was a little obnoxious itself, but, dammit, I’m upset. So let me lay my case out slowly and clearly, simple enough for even a Doors fan to understand.

First of all, I hate movie musicals. I’ll admit, I can enjoy a musical live on stage, where a certain larger-than-lifeness is required, but the minute a musical tries to be translated to celluloid, it becomes overblown, hokey, and uncomfortable. A sensitive viewer comes to feel genuinely bad for the performers high-stepping across the screen, mouthing the typical banalities of a “musical theater” number as their sweating, straining mug is projected in close-up twenty feet high on a large screen for viewing by movie audiences, half of whom are misguided enough to draw some kind of pleasure from this, and the other half dragged into the theater unwillingly by the first half.

The whole purpose of a song in the musical is to further the plot or illuminate the motives of the characters. Trying to shoehorn a cluster of unrelated Beatles songs into this format will do neither the songs nor the audience any favors. Not even if you name the lead characters “Jude” and “Lucy.” (Jeeeeeeeesus!) Has no one learned the lesson handed down by the 1978 Bee Gees movie Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band? (Female lead: “Strawberry Fields.” Male lead: “Billy Shears.” Results: Trainwreck.) Beatles songs exist on a universal plane, and to try to corral them into a half-assed narrative benefits no one.

Let’s talk about Julie Taymor, director of Titus, Frida, and the Broadway version of The Lion King. Although I was struck by some of her visual ideas in Titus, I’ve always felt there was something a little too PBS about Taymor. When you watch her stuff, you are going to Learn, by God. You are going to Appreciate. With this new film, she is making a BOLD STATEMENT about the SIXTIES and DRUGS and VIETNAM.

The music of the Beatles is timeless, not topical, and Taymor has misjudged that. By using their songs to make her “statement,” she has reduced them to another token of a bygone era. In her mind, their “cultural” impact is more important than their musical impact. They have been reduced to headshop novelties, lumped in with tie-dye, VW buses, and Che Guevara T-shirts. They have become cause-oriented sloganeers, figureheads rather than the best rock band of any era. Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Film & TV, Music -- 1960s

Another "music was better back in my day" rant

(2011 note: This is my very first blog entry from early 2007, originally posted my old My Space site. As I was just a baby blogger, it’s not very good, and chunks of it have been re-written and re-purposed for later entries. I keep it as a historical curiosity.)

I have dedicated the past eight years to the field of education, and in doing so passed from a 24-year-old whose evenings out did not really get going until at least 10:00 pm to a 32-year-old whose Target bed-in-a-bag comforter is usually tucked up around his chin by 11:00. The second thoughts and repercussions of this life choice may fill a future blog or two, but is not the subject of tonight’s spiel. The subject of tonight’s spiel is music, and emotional ownership of music.

I am privy to any number of conversations carried on by high school freshman and sophomores when they are supposed to be engaged in whatever drivel I have assigned them. Recently, I heard one freshman lass make repeated references to a “Pete.” Playing the part of stern classroom disciplinarian, I reprimanded her to stay on task, and who was this “Pete” person anyway? Turns out, she was referencing Pete Wentz of the band Fall Out Boy. I made a disparaging comment about the state of young folks’ music, and went back to pretending to work. The freshman girl in question wasn’t even pretending to work, so I guess that puts her one up on me.

Having not heard a lick of Fall Out Boy’s music, but having seen a number of glossy hairstyle-oriented photos and read some reviews, I feel pretty secure in dismissing them as utter horseshit. But I am not the target audience, and the emotional investment of the girl who was discussing them was just as fervent as my own to my own music…a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. No…actually about 15 years ago in the exact same dead-end town of Yuba City, California. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Life & Other Distractions, Music -- 1990s, Music -- 2000s